2018-06-12 18:50:39 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "catch.hpp"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Examples of usage of Generators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This test doesn't do much - it just shows how you can have several generators, of different
|
|
|
|
// types (ie `i` and `j` are different types), can be sequenced using `,` and
|
|
|
|
// can be expressed as named generators (like range) or as individual values.
|
|
|
|
// Generators can be mixed with SECTIONs.
|
|
|
|
// At time of writing the generated values are not automatically reported as part of the test
|
|
|
|
// name or associated values - so we explicitly CAPTURE then (run this with `-s` to see them).
|
|
|
|
// We could also incorporate them into the section names using DYNAMIC_SECTION. See the BDD
|
|
|
|
// example later for more information.
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE("Generators") {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto i = GENERATE( as<std::string>(), "a", "b", "c" );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION( "one" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto j = GENERATE( range( 8, 11 ), 2 );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPTURE( i, j );
|
|
|
|
SUCCEED();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SECTION( "two" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto j = GENERATE( 3.141, 1.379 );
|
|
|
|
CAPTURE( i, j );
|
|
|
|
SUCCEED();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This one generates the cross-product of two ranges.
|
|
|
|
// It's mostly here to demonstrate the performance which, at time of writing,
|
|
|
|
// leaves a lot to be desired.
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE( "100x100 ints", "[.][approvals]" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto x = GENERATE( range( 0,100 ) );
|
|
|
|
auto y = GENERATE( range( 200,300 ) );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK( x < y );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// smaller version
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE( "10x10 ints" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto x = GENERATE( range( 1,11 ) );
|
|
|
|
auto y = GENERATE( range( 101, 111 ) );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK( x < y );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Some of the following tests use structured bindings for convenience and so are
|
|
|
|
// conditionally compiled using the de-facto (and soon to be formally) standard
|
|
|
|
// feature macros
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __cpp_structured_bindings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// One way to do pairs of values (actual/ expected?)
|
|
|
|
// For a simple case like this I'd recommend writing out a series of REQUIREs
|
|
|
|
// but it demonstrates a possible usage.
|
|
|
|
// Spelling out the pair like this is a bit verbose, so read on for better examples
|
|
|
|
// - the use of structured bindings here is an optional convenience
|
2018-08-31 15:56:57 +02:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE( "strlen", "[.][approvals]" ) {
|
2018-06-12 18:50:39 +02:00
|
|
|
auto [test_input, expected] = GENERATE( values<std::pair<std::string_view, size_t>>({
|
|
|
|
{"one", 3},
|
|
|
|
{"two", 3},
|
|
|
|
{"three", 5},
|
|
|
|
{"four", 4}
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE( test_input.size() == expected );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A nicer way to do pairs (or more) of values - using the table generator.
|
|
|
|
// Note, you must specify the types up-front.
|
2018-08-31 15:56:57 +02:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE( "strlen2", "[.][approvals]" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto [test_input, expected] = GENERATE( table<std::string, size_t>({
|
2018-06-12 18:50:39 +02:00
|
|
|
{"one", 3},
|
|
|
|
{"two", 3},
|
|
|
|
{"three", 5},
|
|
|
|
{"four", 4}
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE( test_input.size() == expected );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// An alternate way of doing data tables without structure bindings
|
|
|
|
// - I'd prefer to have the Data class within the test case but gcc 4.x doesn't seem to like it
|
|
|
|
struct Data { std::string str; size_t len; };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE( "strlen3" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto data = GENERATE( values<Data>({
|
|
|
|
{"one", 3},
|
|
|
|
{"two", 3},
|
|
|
|
{"three", 5},
|
|
|
|
{"four", 4}
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE( data.str.size() == data.len );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A nod towards property-based testing - generate a random selection of numbers
|
|
|
|
// in a range and assert on global properties those numbers.
|
|
|
|
static auto square( int i ) -> int { return i*i; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE( "Random numbers in a range", "[.][approvals]" ) {
|
|
|
|
auto x = GENERATE( random( -10000, 10000 ) );
|
|
|
|
CAPTURE( x );
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE( square(x) >= 0 );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __cpp_structured_bindings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Based on example from https://docs.cucumber.io/gherkin/reference/#scenario-outline
|
|
|
|
// (thanks to https://github.com/catchorg/Catch2/issues/850#issuecomment-399504851)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Note that GIVEN, WHEN, and THEN now forward onto DYNAMIC_SECTION instead of SECTION.
|
|
|
|
// DYNAMIC_SECTION takes its name as a stringstream-style expression, so can be formatted using
|
|
|
|
// variables in scope - such as the generated variables here. This reads quite nicely in the
|
|
|
|
// test name output (the full scenario description).
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-31 15:56:57 +02:00
|
|
|
static auto eatCucumbers( int start, int eat ) -> int { return start-eat; }
|
2018-06-12 18:50:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-31 15:56:57 +02:00
|
|
|
SCENARIO("Eating cucumbers", "[.][approvals]") {
|
2018-06-12 18:50:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto [start, eat, left] = GENERATE( table<int,int,int> ({
|
|
|
|
{ 12, 5, 7 },
|
|
|
|
{ 20, 5, 15 }
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIVEN( "there are " << start << " cucumbers" )
|
|
|
|
WHEN( "I eat " << eat << " cucumbers" )
|
|
|
|
THEN( "I should have " << left << " cucumbers" ) {
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE( eatCucumbers( start, eat ) == left );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|