diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 372e2279..b46c6825 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,14 +1,18 @@
[](https://github.com/philsquared/catch/releases)
-[](https://travis-ci.org/philsquared/Catch)
-[](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/philsquared/catch/branch/master)
+[](https://travis-ci.org/philsquared/Catch?branch=catch2)
+[](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/philsquared/catch/branch/catch2)
-The latest, single header, version can be downloaded directly using this link
+The latest version of the single header can be downloaded directly using this link
## What's the Catch?
-Catch stands for C++ Automated Test Cases in Headers and is a multi-paradigm automated test framework for C++ and Objective-C (and, maybe, C). It is implemented entirely in a set of header files, but is packaged up as a single header for extra convenience.
+Catch stands for C++ Automated Test Cases in Headers and is a
+multi-paradigm test framework for C++. which also supports Objective-C
+and, maybe, C.
+It is primarily distributed as a single header file, although certain
+extensions may require additional headers.
## How to use it
This documentation comprises these three parts:
diff --git a/docs/why-catch.md b/docs/why-catch.md
index 1dbc43bc..82257d68 100644
--- a/docs/why-catch.md
+++ b/docs/why-catch.md
@@ -1,12 +1,18 @@
# Why do we need yet another C++ test framework?
-Good question. For C++ there are quite a number of established frameworks, including (but not limited to), [CppUnit](http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/cppunit/index.php?title=Main_Page), [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/), [Boost.Test](http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html), [Aeryn](https://launchpad.net/aeryn), [Cute](http://r2.ifs.hsr.ch/cute), [Fructose](http://fructose.sourceforge.net/) and [many, many more](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B). Even for Objective-C there are a few, including OCUnit - which now comes bundled with XCode.
+Good question. For C++ there are quite a number of established frameworks,
+including (but not limited to),
+[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/),
+[Boost.Test](http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html),
+[CppUnit](http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/cppunit/index.php?title=Main_Page),
+[Cute](http://r2.ifs.hsr.ch/cute),
+[many, many more](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B).
So what does Catch bring to the party that differentiates it from these? Apart from a Catchy name, of course.
## Key Features
-* Really easy to get started. Just download catch.hpp, `#include` it and you're away.
+* Quick and Really easy to get started. Just download catch.hpp, `#include` it and you're away.
* No external dependencies. As long as you can compile C++11 and have a C++ standard library available.
* Write test cases as, self-registering, functions (or methods, if you prefer).
* Divide test cases into sections, each of which is run in isolation (eliminates the need for fixtures).
@@ -28,13 +34,6 @@ So what does Catch bring to the party that differentiates it from these? Apart f
* Internal and friendly macros are isolated so name clashes can be managed
* Matchers
-## Objective-C-specific features
-
-* Automatically detects if you are using it from an Objective-C project
-* Works with and without ARC with no additional configuration
-* Implement test fixtures using Obj-C classes too (like OCUnit)
-* Additional built in matchers that work with Obj-C types (e.g. string matchers)
-
## Who else is using Catch?
See the list of [open source projects using Catch](opensource-users.md).