Some clean-ups

This commit is contained in:
Phil Nash 2017-07-13 08:29:12 +01:00
parent d2d5910479
commit e4456aa243

View File

@ -15,17 +15,10 @@
#include <limits>
struct TestData {
TestData()
: int_seven( 7 ),
str_hello( "hello" ),
float_nine_point_one( 9.1f ),
double_pi( 3.1415926535 )
{}
int int_seven;
std::string str_hello;
float float_nine_point_one;
double double_pi;
int int_seven = 7;
std::string str_hello = "hello";
float float_nine_point_one = 9.1f;
double double_pi = 3.1415926535;
};
@ -36,14 +29,13 @@ struct TestDef {
TestDef& operator[]( const std::string& ) {
return *this;
}
};
// The "failing" tests all use the CHECK macro, which continues if the specific test fails.
// This allows us to see all results, even if an earlier check fails
// Equality tests
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed" )
{
TestDef td;
@ -83,7 +75,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!mayfail]" )
CHECK( x == Approx( 1.301 ) );
}
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed" )
{
TestData data;
@ -112,7 +104,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!shouldfail]" )
}
// Ordering comparison tests
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed" )
{
TestData data;
@ -169,7 +161,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
}
// Comparisons with int literals
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned" )
{
int i = 1;
unsigned int ui = 2;
@ -207,7 +199,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigne
#pragma warning(disable:4389) // '==' : signed/unsigned mismatch
#endif
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables", "" )
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables" )
{
long long_var = 1L;
unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
@ -221,7 +213,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables", "" )
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_long_var );
}
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables", "" )
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables" )
{
const unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
const unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1;
@ -234,7 +226,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables", "" )
REQUIRE( unsigned_long_var == 1 );
}
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour" )
{
CHECK( ( -1 > 2u ) );
CHECK( -1 > 2u );
@ -247,7 +239,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++
CHECK( minInt > 2u );
}
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed" )
{
CHECK( 54 == 6*9 );
}
@ -259,7 +251,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed", "" )
inline const char* returnsConstNull(){ return nullptr; }
inline char* returnsNull(){ return nullptr; }
TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null", "" )
TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null" )
{
TestData* p = nullptr;
TestData* pNULL = nullptr;
@ -291,7 +283,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null", "" )
// is detected and a warning issued.
// An alternative form of the macros (CHECK_FALSE and REQUIRE_FALSE) can be used instead to capture
// the operand value.
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed", "" )
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed" )
{
bool falseValue = false;