They also got slapped with the `[approvals]` tag in the process,
because we have too many approval tests and want less of them,
and these particular tests don't bring much value.
Related to #2090
There is an increasing number of places where Catch2 wants to parse
strings into numbers, but being stuck in C++14 world, we do not
have good stdlib facilities to do this (`strtoul` and `stoul`
are both bad).
Test case hashing includes tags and class name
As the hasher involves more code now, it was split out into its own file
and it got its own set of tests.
Closes#2304
Removed:
* NaN normalization
* INFINITY normalization
* errno normalization
* Completely unused duration regex
Tests using these macros should be tagged `[approvals]`
so they are not run as part of approval tests.
Also simplified regex for the test's executable filename,
and hidden some tests relying on nullptr normalization.
Previously a lambda parser in Clara could only be invoked once,
even if it internally was ok with being invoked multiple times.
With this change, a lambda parser can mark itself as `accept_many`,
in which case it will be invoked multiple times if the appropriate
flag was supplied multiple times by the user.
The problem came from the console reporter trying to provide a
fancy linebreaking (primarily for things like `SCENARIO` or the
BDD macros), so that new lines start with extra indentation if
the text being line broken starts as "{text}: ".
The console reporter did not properly take into account cases
where the ": " part would already be in a later line, in which
case it would ask for non-sensical level of indentation (larger
than single line length).
We fixed this by also enforcing that the special indentation case
only triggers if the ": " is found early enough in the line, so
that we also avoid degenerate cases like this:
```
blablabla: F
a
n
c
y
.
.
.
```
Fixes#2309
This is a simplification of the fix proposed in #2152, with the
critical function split out so that it can be tested directly,
without having to go through the ULP matcher.
Closes#2152
More specifically, made the actual implementation of string-like
type handling take argument as `Catch::StringRef`, instead of
taking `std::string const&`.
This means that string-like types that are not `std::string` no
longer need to pay for an extra construction of `std::string`
(including the potential allocation), before they can be stringified.
The actual string stringification routine is now also better about
reserving sufficient space.
This includes
* Testing both positive and negative path through the matchers
* Testing them with types whose `begin` and `end` member functions
require ADL
* Testing them with types that return different types from `begin`
and `end`
This means that code such as
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
SECTION("first") { SUCCEED(); }
auto _ = GENERATE(1, 2);
SECTION("second") { SUCCEED(); }
}
```
will run and report 3 assertions, 1 from section "first" and 2
from section "second". This also applies for greater and potentially
more confusing nesting, but fundamentally it is up to the user to
avoid overly complex and confusing nestings, just as with `SECTION`s.
The old behaviour of `GENERATE` as first thing in a `TEST_CASE`,
`GENERATE` not followed by a `SECTION`, etc etc should be unchanged.
Closes#1938
* Successive executions of the same `GENERATE` macro (e.g. because
of a for loop) no longer lead to multiple nested generators.
* The same line can now contain multiple `GENERATE` macros without
issues.
Fixes#1913
This simplified variant supports only a subset of the functionality
in `std::unique_ptr<T>`. `Catch::Detail::unique_ptr<T>` only supports
single element pointer (no array support) with default deleter.
By removing the support for custom deleters, we also avoid requiring
significant machinery to support EBO, speeding up instantiations of
`unique_ptr<T>` significantly. Catch2 also currently does not need
to support `unique_ptr<T[]>`, so that is not supported either.
Originally the tests were from #1912, but as it turned out, the issue
was somewhere else. Still, the inputs provided were interesting, so
they are now part of our test suite.
It did not clear out all of its internal state when switching from
one pattern to another, so when it should've escaped `,`, it took
its position from its position in the original user-provided string,
rather than its position in the current pattern.
Fixes#1905
`SizeIs` can accept both `size_t` and a matcher. In the first case,
it checks whether the size of the range is equal to specified size.
In the second case, it checks whether the provided matcher accepts
the size of the range.
This commit also forbids composing lvalues of composed matchers, as
per previous deprecation notice. I do not expect this to be contentious
in practice, because there was a bug in that usage for years, and
nobody complained.
Given that in the 2 or so years that matchers are thing nobody complained,
it seems that people do not actually write this sort of code, and the
possibility will be removed in v3. However, to avoid correctness bugs,
we will have to support this weird code in v2.
Martin Hořeňovský