This means that code such as
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
SECTION("first") { SUCCEED(); }
auto _ = GENERATE(1, 2);
SECTION("second") { SUCCEED(); }
}
```
will run and report 3 assertions, 1 from section "first" and 2
from section "second". This also applies for greater and potentially
more confusing nesting, but fundamentally it is up to the user to
avoid overly complex and confusing nestings, just as with `SECTION`s.
The old behaviour of `GENERATE` as first thing in a `TEST_CASE`,
`GENERATE` not followed by a `SECTION`, etc etc should be unchanged.
Closes#1938
* Successive executions of the same `GENERATE` macro (e.g. because
of a for loop) no longer lead to multiple nested generators.
* The same line can now contain multiple `GENERATE` macros without
issues.
Fixes#1913
Originally the tests were from #1912, but as it turned out, the issue
was somewhere else. Still, the inputs provided were interesting, so
they are now part of our test suite.
It did not clear out all of its internal state when switching from
one pattern to another, so when it should've escaped `,`, it took
its position from its position in the original user-provided string,
rather than its position in the current pattern.
Fixes#1905
Eventually this needs to be fixed in the textflow project by Phil,
but he has not done so in the half a year this bug has been known
to be there, so...
Closes#1470Closes#1455
This avoids the problem where writes to stderr/stdout stop being
line-buffered when stderr/stdout is redirected to a file, which led
to different order of outputs between Linux and Windows in our tests.
The fix leaves an open question: should we keep treating refs
to static array of chars as strings, or should we instead
use `strnlen` to check if it is null-terminated within the buffer
Fixes#1238
A) non-const comparison operators should not exist and should not be
encouraged
B) The logic breaks comparing function pointers certain way
C) It was inconsistent anyway, as it only applied to `==` and `!=`
Closes#925
