Refactor FilterGenerator to remove ctor call to overridden method next()
in order to address clang static analyzer diagnostic:
catch2-src/single_include/catch2/catch.hpp:4166:42: note: Call to virtual method 'FilterGenerator::next' during construction bypasses virtual dispatch
auto has_initial_value = next();
^~~~~~
* Suppressed warning for comma-in-indexing-operator in tests that check
that specific behaviour.
* Made deprecated (and removed) allocator usings conditional on the tests
being compiled with old version of MSVC that still requires them.
Fixes#2272
The problem was that under specific circumstances, namely that none
of their children progressed, `GeneratorTracker` will not progress.
This was changed recently, to allow for code like this, where a
`SECTION` follows a `GENERATE` at the same level:
```cpp
SECTION("A") {}
auto a = GENERATE(1, 2);
SECTION("B") {}
```
However, this interacted badly with `SECTION` filters (`-c foo`),
as they could deactivate all `SECTION`s below a generator, and thus
stop it from progressing forever. This commit makes GeneratorTracker
check whether there are any filters active, and if they are, it checks
whether its section-children can ever run.
Fixes#2025
The problem was that Catch2 did not reliably include `<exception>`
before it checked for the feature test macro for
`std::uncaught_exceptions`. To avoid overhead of including
`<exception>` everywhere, the configuration check was split out
into a separate header.
Closes#2021
This means that code such as
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
SECTION("first") { SUCCEED(); }
auto _ = GENERATE(1, 2);
SECTION("second") { SUCCEED(); }
}
```
will run and report 3 assertions, 1 from section "first" and 2
from section "second". This also applies for greater and potentially
more confusing nesting, but fundamentally it is up to the user to
avoid overly complex and confusing nestings, just as with `SECTION`s.
The old behaviour of `GENERATE` as first thing in a `TEST_CASE`,
`GENERATE` not followed by a `SECTION`, etc etc should be unchanged.
Closes#1938
A test runner already has a --durations option to print durations.
However, this isn't entirely satisfactory.
When there are many tests, this produces output spam which makes it hard
to find the test failure output. Nevertheless, it is helpful to be
informed of tests which are unusually slow.
Therefore, introduce a new option --min-duration that causes all
durations above a certain threshold to be printed. This allows slow
tests to be visible without mentioning every test.
* Successive executions of the same `GENERATE` macro (e.g. because
of a for loop) no longer lead to multiple nested generators.
* The same line can now contain multiple `GENERATE` macros without
issues.
Fixes#1913
This brings our output inline with GTest's. We do not handle skipped
tests properly, but that should be currently less important than
having the attribute exist with proper value for non-skipped tests.
Thanks @joda-01.
Closes#1899
Originally the tests were from #1912, but as it turned out, the issue
was somewhere else. Still, the inputs provided were interesting, so
they are now part of our test suite.
It did not clear out all of its internal state when switching from
one pattern to another, so when it should've escaped `,`, it took
its position from its position in the original user-provided string,
rather than its position in the current pattern.
Fixes#1905
The old code caused warnings to fire under MSVC, and Clang <3.8.
I could not find a GCC version where it worked, but I assume that it
did at some point.
This new code causes all of MSVC, GCC, Clang, in current versions,
to emit signed/unsigned comparison warning in test like this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
int32_t i = -1;
uint32_t j = 1;
REQUIRE(i != j);
}
```
Where previously only MSVC would emit the warning.
Fixes#1880
Given that in the 2 or so years that matchers are thing nobody complained,
it seems that people do not actually write this sort of code, and the
possibility will be removed in v3. However, to avoid correctness bugs,
we will have to support this weird code in v2.
Add both `[.]` and `[!hide]` tags when registering a hidden test case, as per documentation.
Co-authored-by: Martin Hořeňovský <martin.horenovsky@gmail.com>
- Overrides added
- usages of push_back() replaced with emplace_back()
- Loop variable made const-refernce
- NULL replaced with nullptr
- Names used in the declaration and definition unified
- size() replaced with empty
- Identical cases merged
b77cec05c0 fixed this problem for tagging tests, so that a test
case tagged with `[.foo]` would be parsed as tagged with `[.][foo]`.
This does the same for the test spec parsing.
Fixes#1798
Previously, each warning suppression was self-contained, with its
own pair of `SUPPRESS_X_WARNING` and `UNSUPPRESS_X_WARNING` macros.
This had the obvious advantage of being self-containing, but it
also meant that if we needed to suppress more than one warning
in a single place, then we would manipulate the compiler's warning
state multiple times, even though logically we would only need one
layer.
The new way of suppressing warnings in macros is to push compiler's
warning state with `CATCH_INTERNAL_START_WARNINGS_SUPPRESSION` macro,
then disable whatever macros we need with the
`CATCH_INTERNAL_SUPPRESS_X_WARNINGS` macro, and then return to the
previous state using `CATCH_INTERNAL_STOP_WARNINGS_SUPPRESSION`.
The JUnit report is improved in that:
* The message shows the testing condition, not the result
* The actual message has similar output than the console one
