It's = it is
In the sentence "In fact it is usually a good idea to put the block with the ```#define``` [in it's own source file](slow-compiles.md).", the correct usage is "its", not "it's".
Catch passes ::tolower into std::transform with string iterators.
::tolower has the signature int(int), which triggers a stealth narrowing
warning inside std::transform, because transform calls
*_Dest = _Fn(*_First), which implicitly narrows an int to a char.
For this particular application the narrowing is fine, so explicitly
narrow in a lambda.
Catch passes an RNG which accepts int to random_shuffle. Inside
random_shuffle, the STL tries to call that RNG with the difference_type
of the user provided iterators. For std::vector, this is ptrdiff_t,
which on amd64 builds is wider than int. This triggers a narrowing
warning because the 64 bit difference is being truncated to 32 bits.
Note that this RNG implementation still does not produce a correctly
uniformly shuffled result -- it's currently asserting that std::rand
can produce 1000000 which is false -- but I don't know enough about
how much repeatable shuffles are necessary here, so I'm leaving that
alone for now.
SCENARIO does not add leading spaces to the test name (only BDD-style section
names are modified), so the trimming is not necessary. But if the name is
trimmed, it makes it harder to correlate the output of XML reporter with tests
that have leading spaces in their name: e.g. these tests will have the same name
attribute:
TEST_CASE("Test") {}
TEST_CASE(" Test") {}
This commit fixes the following scenario:
* You have a test that compares strings with embedded control
characters.
* The test fails.
* You are using JUnit tests within TeamCity.
Before this commit, the JUnit report watcher fails on parsing the XML
for two reasons: the control characters are missing a semicolon at the
end, and the XML document doesn't specify that it is XML 1.1.
XML 1.0 --- what we get if we don't specify an XML version --- doesn't support embedding control characters --- see
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/404107/why-are-control-characters-illegal-in-xml
for all of the gory details.
This is based on PR #588 by @mrpi
