The old code caused warnings to fire under MSVC, and Clang <3.8.
I could not find a GCC version where it worked, but I assume that it
did at some point.
This new code causes all of MSVC, GCC, Clang, in current versions,
to emit signed/unsigned comparison warning in test like this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
int32_t i = -1;
uint32_t j = 1;
REQUIRE(i != j);
}
```
Where previously only MSVC would emit the warning.
Fixes#1880
Given that in the 2 or so years that matchers are thing nobody complained,
it seems that people do not actually write this sort of code, and the
possibility will be removed in v3. However, to avoid correctness bugs,
we will have to support this weird code in v2.
C++11 math requires _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1 to be true with gcc/clang.
Also fixes an issue with uClibc-ng where __UCLIBC__ is defined in features.h but
that is not included here and is thus no-op.
Add both `[.]` and `[!hide]` tags when registering a hidden test case, as per documentation.
Co-authored-by: Martin Hořeňovský <martin.horenovsky@gmail.com>
- Overrides added
- usages of push_back() replaced with emplace_back()
- Loop variable made const-refernce
- NULL replaced with nullptr
- Names used in the declaration and definition unified
- size() replaced with empty
- Identical cases merged
b77cec05c0 fixed this problem for tagging tests, so that a test
case tagged with `[.foo]` would be parsed as tagged with `[.][foo]`.
This does the same for the test spec parsing.
Fixes#1798
Copying a `ReusableStringStream` would lead to "double free" of
the stream, and thus it could be used in multiple places at the
same time, breaking the output.
On systems where std::chrono::steady_clock::period is not std::nano, benchmark tests fail to compile due to trying to convert analysis.samples from a vector of duration<double, clock::period> to a vector of std::chrono::duration<double, std::nano>.
Previously, each warning suppression was self-contained, with its
own pair of `SUPPRESS_X_WARNING` and `UNSUPPRESS_X_WARNING` macros.
This had the obvious advantage of being self-containing, but it
also meant that if we needed to suppress more than one warning
in a single place, then we would manipulate the compiler's warning
state multiple times, even though logically we would only need one
layer.
The new way of suppressing warnings in macros is to push compiler's
warning state with `CATCH_INTERNAL_START_WARNINGS_SUPPRESSION` macro,
then disable whatever macros we need with the
`CATCH_INTERNAL_SUPPRESS_X_WARNINGS` macro, and then return to the
previous state using `CATCH_INTERNAL_STOP_WARNINGS_SUPPRESSION`.
The JUnit report is improved in that:
* The message shows the testing condition, not the result
* The actual message has similar output than the console one
Now it no longer tries to be this weird hybrid between an owning
and non-owning reference, and is only ever non-owning. This is also
reflected in its interface, for example `StringRef::isNullTerminated`
is now public, and `StringRef::c_str()` has the precondition that it
is true.
Overview of the changes:
* The `StringRef::m_data` member has been completely removed, as it
had no more uses.
* `StringRef::isSubstring()` has been made public and renamed to
`StringRef::isNullTerminated()`, so that the name reflects what the
method actually does.
* `StringRef::currentData()` has been renamed to `StringRef::data()`,
to be in line with common C++ containers and container-alikes.
* `StringRef::c_str()` will no longer silently make copies. It instead
has a precondition that `isNullTerminated()` is true.
* If the user needs a null-terminated string, they should use the
`std::string` conversion operator and call `c_str()` on the resulting
`std::string`.
* Some small optimizations in various places.
* Basic functionality is now `constexpr`.
This should now properly handle small numbers which would previously
output something like `[0.00000000000000019, 0.00000000000000019]`,
which does not allow user to read the numbers properly.
Closes#1760
this warning was introduced by rework to support NTTPs
since we have implementation macro for NTTPs and normal template test cases
warning is going to be suppressed
Fixes#1762
