/* * Created by Phil on 08/11/2010. * Copyright 2010 Two Blue Cubes Ltd. All rights reserved. * * Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying * file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) */ #ifdef __clang__ # pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wpadded" # pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wc++98-compat" #endif #include "catch.hpp" #include #include struct TestData { TestData() : int_seven( 7 ), str_hello( "hello" ), float_nine_point_one( 9.1f ), double_pi( 3.1415926535 ) {} int int_seven; std::string str_hello; float float_nine_point_one; double double_pi; }; struct TestDef { TestDef& operator + ( const std::string& ) { return *this; } TestDef& operator[]( const std::string& ) { return *this; } }; // The "failing" tests all use the CHECK macro, which continues if the specific test fails. // This allows us to see all results, even if an earlier check fails // Equality tests TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed", "" ) { TestDef td; td + "hello" + "hello"; TestData data; REQUIRE( data.int_seven == 7 ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.1f ) ); REQUIRE( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415926535 ) ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello == "hello" ); REQUIRE( "hello" == data.str_hello ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() == 5 ); double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1; REQUIRE( x == Approx( 1.3 ) ); } TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!mayfail]" ) { TestData data; CHECK( data.int_seven == 6 ); CHECK( data.int_seven == 8 ); CHECK( data.int_seven == 0 ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.11f ) ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.0f ) ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 1 ) ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 0 ) ); CHECK( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415 ) ); CHECK( data.str_hello == "goodbye" ); CHECK( data.str_hello == "hell" ); CHECK( data.str_hello == "hello1" ); CHECK( data.str_hello.size() == 6 ); double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1; CHECK( x == Approx( 1.301 ) ); } TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed", "" ) { TestData data; REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 6 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 8 ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.11f ) ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.0f ) ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 1 ) ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 0 ) ); REQUIRE( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415 ) ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "goodbye" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hell" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hello1" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() != 6 ); } TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!shouldfail]" ) { TestData data; CHECK( data.int_seven != 7 ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.1f ) ); CHECK( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415926535 ) ); CHECK( data.str_hello != "hello" ); CHECK( data.str_hello.size() != 5 ); } // Ordering comparison tests TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed", "" ) { TestData data; REQUIRE( data.int_seven < 8 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 6 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 0 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven > -1 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 7 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 6 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 7 ); REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 8 ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one > 9 ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 10 ); REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 9.2 ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello <= "hello" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello >= "hello" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "hellp" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "zebra" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "hellm" ); REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "a" ); } TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" ) { TestData data; CHECK( data.int_seven > 7 ); CHECK( data.int_seven < 7 ); CHECK( data.int_seven > 8 ); CHECK( data.int_seven < 6 ); CHECK( data.int_seven < 0 ); CHECK( data.int_seven < -1 ); CHECK( data.int_seven >= 8 ); CHECK( data.int_seven <= 6 ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one < 9 ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 10 ); CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 9.2 ); CHECK( data.str_hello > "hello" ); CHECK( data.str_hello < "hello" ); CHECK( data.str_hello > "hellp" ); CHECK( data.str_hello > "z" ); CHECK( data.str_hello < "hellm" ); CHECK( data.str_hello < "a" ); CHECK( data.str_hello >= "z" ); CHECK( data.str_hello <= "a" ); } // Comparisons with int literals TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned", "" ) { int i = 1; unsigned int ui = 2; long l = 3; unsigned long ul = 4; char c = 5; unsigned char uc = 6; REQUIRE( i == 1 ); REQUIRE( ui == 2 ); REQUIRE( l == 3 ); REQUIRE( ul == 4 ); REQUIRE( c == 5 ); REQUIRE( uc == 6 ); REQUIRE( 1 == i ); REQUIRE( 2 == ui ); REQUIRE( 3 == l ); REQUIRE( 4 == ul ); REQUIRE( 5 == c ); REQUIRE( 6 == uc ); REQUIRE( (std::numeric_limits::max)() > ul ); } // Disable warnings about sign conversions for the next two tests // (as we are deliberately invoking them) // - Currently only disabled for GCC/ LLVM. Should add VC++ too #ifdef __GNUC__ #pragma GCC diagnostic push #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-compare" #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-conversion" #endif #ifdef _MSC_VER #pragma warning(disable:4389) // '==' : signed/unsigned mismatch #endif TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables", "" ) { long long_var = 1L; unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1; unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1; unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1; unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L; REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_char_var ); REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_short_var ); REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_int_var ); REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_long_var ); } TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables", "" ) { const unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1; const unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1; const unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1; const unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L; REQUIRE( unsigned_char_var == 1 ); REQUIRE( unsigned_short_var == 1 ); REQUIRE( unsigned_int_var == 1 ); REQUIRE( unsigned_long_var == 1 ); } TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour", "" ) { CHECK( ( -1 > 2u ) ); CHECK( -1 > 2u ); CHECK( ( 2u < -1 ) ); CHECK( 2u < -1 ); const int minInt = (std::numeric_limits::min)(); CHECK( ( minInt > 2u ) ); CHECK( minInt > 2u ); } TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed", "" ) { CHECK( 54 == 6*9 ); } #ifdef __GNUC__ #pragma GCC diagnostic pop #endif inline const char* returnsConstNull(){ return nullptr; } inline char* returnsNull(){ return nullptr; } TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null", "" ) { TestData* p = nullptr; TestData* pNULL = nullptr; REQUIRE( p == nullptr ); REQUIRE( p == pNULL ); TestData data; p = &data; REQUIRE( p != nullptr ); const TestData* cp = p; REQUIRE( cp != nullptr ); const TestData* const cpc = p; REQUIRE( cpc != nullptr ); REQUIRE( returnsNull() == nullptr ); REQUIRE( returnsConstNull() == nullptr ); REQUIRE( nullptr != p ); } // Not (!) tests // The problem with the ! operator is that it has right-to-left associativity. // This means we can't isolate it when we decompose. The simple REQUIRE( !false ) form, therefore, // cannot have the operand value extracted. The test will work correctly, and the situation // is detected and a warning issued. // An alternative form of the macros (CHECK_FALSE and REQUIRE_FALSE) can be used instead to capture // the operand value. TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed", "" ) { bool falseValue = false; REQUIRE( false == false ); REQUIRE( true == true ); REQUIRE( !false ); REQUIRE_FALSE( false ); REQUIRE( !falseValue ); REQUIRE_FALSE( falseValue ); REQUIRE( !(1 == 2) ); REQUIRE_FALSE( 1 == 2 ); } TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" ) { bool trueValue = true; CHECK( false != false ); CHECK( true != true ); CHECK( !true ); CHECK_FALSE( true ); CHECK( !trueValue ); CHECK_FALSE( trueValue ); CHECK( !(1 == 1) ); CHECK_FALSE( 1 == 1 ); }