catch2/tests/SelfTest/UsageTests/Condition.tests.cpp
Martin Hořeňovský e1e6872c4c
Standardize header names and file locations
This is both a really big and a really small commit. It is small in
that it only contains renaming, moving and modification of include
directives caused by this.

It is really big in the obvious way of touching something like 200
files.

The new rules for naming files is simple: headers use the `.hpp`
extension. The rules for physical file layout is still kinda in
progress, but the basics are also simple:
 * Significant parts of functionality get their own subfolder
   * Benchmarking is in `catch2/benchmark`
   * Matchers are in `catch2/matchers`
   * Generators are in `catch2/generators`
   * Reporters are in `catch2/reporters`
   * Baseline testing facilities are in `catch2/`
 * Various top level folders also contain `internal` subfolder,
   with files that users probably do not want to include directly,
   at least not until they have to write something like their own
   reporter.
    * The exact files in these subfolders is likely to change later
      on

Note that while some includes were cleaned up in this commit, it
is only the low hanging fruit and further cleanup using automatic
tooling will happen later.

Also note that various include guards, copyright notices and file
headers will also be standardized later, rather than in this commit.
2020-04-24 18:58:44 +02:00

335 lines
8.9 KiB
C++

/*
* Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
* file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
*/
#ifdef __clang__
# pragma clang diagnostic push
# pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wpadded"
// Wdouble-promotion is not supported until 3.8
# if (__clang_major__ > 3) || (__clang_major__ == 3 && __clang_minor__ > 7)
# pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wdouble-promotion"
# endif
#endif
#include <catch2/catch_approx.hpp>
#include <catch2/catch_test_macros.hpp>
using Catch::Approx;
#include <string>
#include <limits>
#include <cstdint>
namespace { namespace ConditionTests {
#ifndef CONDITION_TEST_HELPERS_INCLUDED // Don't compile this more than once per TU
#define CONDITION_TEST_HELPERS_INCLUDED
struct TestData {
int int_seven = 7;
std::string str_hello = "hello";
float float_nine_point_one = 9.1f;
double double_pi = 3.1415926535;
};
struct TestDef {
TestDef& operator + ( const std::string& ) {
return *this;
}
TestDef& operator[]( const std::string& ) {
return *this;
}
};
inline const char* returnsConstNull(){ return nullptr; }
inline char* returnsNull(){ return nullptr; }
#endif
// The "failing" tests all use the CHECK macro, which continues if the specific test fails.
// This allows us to see all results, even if an earlier check fails
// Equality tests
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed" )
{
TestDef td;
td + "hello" + "hello";
TestData data;
REQUIRE( data.int_seven == 7 );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.1f ) );
REQUIRE( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415926535 ) );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello == "hello" );
REQUIRE( "hello" == data.str_hello );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() == 5 );
double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1;
REQUIRE( x == Approx( 1.3 ) );
}
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!mayfail]" )
{
TestData data;
CHECK( data.int_seven == 6 );
CHECK( data.int_seven == 8 );
CHECK( data.int_seven == 0 );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.11f ) );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.0f ) );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 1 ) );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 0 ) );
CHECK( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415 ) );
CHECK( data.str_hello == "goodbye" );
CHECK( data.str_hello == "hell" );
CHECK( data.str_hello == "hello1" );
CHECK( data.str_hello.size() == 6 );
double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1;
CHECK( x == Approx( 1.301 ) );
}
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed" )
{
TestData data;
REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 6 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 8 );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.11f ) );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.0f ) );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 1 ) );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 0 ) );
REQUIRE( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415 ) );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "goodbye" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hell" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hello1" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() != 6 );
}
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!shouldfail]" )
{
TestData data;
CHECK( data.int_seven != 7 );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.1f ) );
CHECK( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415926535 ) );
CHECK( data.str_hello != "hello" );
CHECK( data.str_hello.size() != 5 );
}
// Ordering comparison tests
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed" )
{
TestData data;
REQUIRE( data.int_seven < 8 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 6 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 0 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven > -1 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 7 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 6 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 7 );
REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 8 );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one > 9 );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 10 );
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 9.2 );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello <= "hello" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello >= "hello" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "hellp" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "zebra" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "hellm" );
REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "a" );
}
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
{
TestData data;
CHECK( data.int_seven > 7 );
CHECK( data.int_seven < 7 );
CHECK( data.int_seven > 8 );
CHECK( data.int_seven < 6 );
CHECK( data.int_seven < 0 );
CHECK( data.int_seven < -1 );
CHECK( data.int_seven >= 8 );
CHECK( data.int_seven <= 6 );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one < 9 );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 10 );
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 9.2 );
CHECK( data.str_hello > "hello" );
CHECK( data.str_hello < "hello" );
CHECK( data.str_hello > "hellp" );
CHECK( data.str_hello > "z" );
CHECK( data.str_hello < "hellm" );
CHECK( data.str_hello < "a" );
CHECK( data.str_hello >= "z" );
CHECK( data.str_hello <= "a" );
}
#ifdef __clang__
# pragma clang diagnostic pop
#endif
// Comparisons with int literals
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned" )
{
int i = 1;
unsigned int ui = 2;
long l = 3;
unsigned long ul = 4;
char c = 5;
unsigned char uc = 6;
REQUIRE( i == 1 );
REQUIRE( ui == 2 );
REQUIRE( l == 3 );
REQUIRE( ul == 4 );
REQUIRE( c == 5 );
REQUIRE( uc == 6 );
REQUIRE( 1 == i );
REQUIRE( 2 == ui );
REQUIRE( 3 == l );
REQUIRE( 4 == ul );
REQUIRE( 5 == c );
REQUIRE( 6 == uc );
REQUIRE( (std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max)() > ul );
}
// Disable warnings about sign conversions for the next two tests
// (as we are deliberately invoking them)
// - Currently only disabled for GCC/ LLVM. Should add VC++ too
#ifdef __GNUC__
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-compare"
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-conversion"
#endif
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#pragma warning(disable:4389) // '==' : signed/unsigned mismatch
#endif
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables" )
{
long long_var = 1L;
unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1;
unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1;
unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L;
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_char_var );
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_short_var );
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_int_var );
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_long_var );
}
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables" )
{
const unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
const unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1;
const unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1;
const unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L;
REQUIRE( unsigned_char_var == 1 );
REQUIRE( unsigned_short_var == 1 );
REQUIRE( unsigned_int_var == 1 );
REQUIRE( unsigned_long_var == 1 );
}
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour" )
{
CHECK( ( -1 > 2u ) );
CHECK( -1 > 2u );
CHECK( ( 2u < -1 ) );
CHECK( 2u < -1 );
const int minInt = (std::numeric_limits<int>::min)();
CHECK( ( minInt > 2u ) );
CHECK( minInt > 2u );
}
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed" )
{
CHECK( 54 == 6*9 );
}
#ifdef __GNUC__
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
#endif
TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null" )
{
TestData* p = nullptr;
TestData* pNULL = nullptr;
REQUIRE( p == nullptr );
REQUIRE( p == pNULL );
TestData data;
p = &data;
REQUIRE( p != nullptr );
const TestData* cp = p;
REQUIRE( cp != nullptr );
const TestData* const cpc = p;
REQUIRE( cpc != nullptr );
REQUIRE( returnsNull() == nullptr );
REQUIRE( returnsConstNull() == nullptr );
REQUIRE( nullptr != p );
}
// Not (!) tests
// The problem with the ! operator is that it has right-to-left associativity.
// This means we can't isolate it when we decompose. The simple REQUIRE( !false ) form, therefore,
// cannot have the operand value extracted. The test will work correctly, and the situation
// is detected and a warning issued.
// An alternative form of the macros (CHECK_FALSE and REQUIRE_FALSE) can be used instead to capture
// the operand value.
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed" )
{
bool falseValue = false;
REQUIRE( false == false );
REQUIRE( true == true );
REQUIRE( !false );
REQUIRE_FALSE( false );
REQUIRE( !falseValue );
REQUIRE_FALSE( falseValue );
REQUIRE( !(1 == 2) );
REQUIRE_FALSE( 1 == 2 );
}
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
{
bool trueValue = true;
CHECK( false != false );
CHECK( true != true );
CHECK( !true );
CHECK_FALSE( true );
CHECK( !trueValue );
CHECK_FALSE( trueValue );
CHECK( !(1 == 1) );
CHECK_FALSE( 1 == 1 );
}
}} // namespace ConditionTests