Without SSE2 enabled, x86 targets will use x87 FPU, which breaks
the tests checking for reproducible results from our random
floating point number generators. The output is still reproducible,
at least between binaries targetting x87, but the tests hardcode
results for the whole pipeline being done in 32/64bit precision.
Closes#2796
By moving to use our `uniform_integer_distribution`, which is
reproducible across different platforms, instead of the stdlib
one which is not, we can provide reproducible results for `float`s
and `double`s. Still no reproducibility for `long double`s, because
those are too different across different platforms.
* Utility for extended mult n x n bits -> 2n bits
* Utility to adapt output from URBG to target (unsigned) integral
type
* Utility to reorder signed values into unsigned type while keeping
the order.
Specifically we add
* `gamma(a, b)`, which returns the magnitude of largest 1-ULP
step in range [a, b].
* `count_equidistant_float(a, b, distance)`, which returns the
number of equi-distant floats in range [a, b].
Technically, the declaration should not have a space between
the quotes and the underscore, because `_foo` is a reserved
identifier, but `""_foo` is not. In general it works, but newer
Clang versions warn about this, because WG21 wants to deprecate
and later remove this form completely.
The basic idea was to reduce the number of things dependent on the `Clock`
type. To that end, I replaced `Duration<Clock>` with `IDuration` typedef
for `std::nanoseconds`, and `FloatDuration<Clock>` with `FDuration`
typedef for `Duration<double, std::nano>`. We can generally assume that
any clock's duration can be expressed in nanoseconds, as long as we insert
`duration_cast`s into the right places.
Note that we cannot remove all dependence on `Clock` as a template
arguments, because functions that actually measure the elapsed time have
to use the Clock.
We also changed some template function arguments to pass plain function
pointers, so that the actual implementation can be placed into a cpp file.
* AssertionEnd does not reset the assertion info yet. That is done after populateReaction. And reset assertion info would also reset the result disposition to normal, so that any uncaught exception would be reported as failure
* Approving test output changes due to added unit tests
* Unit tests to throw std::runtime_error instead of std::exception
* Add a unit test to test incomplete assertion handler
---------
Co-authored-by: Ross <ross.tang@gfo-x.com>
To keep the compilation firewall effect, the implementations
are hidden behind a PIMPL. In this case it is probably not
worth it, but we can inline it later if needed.
Also split out helpers for testing matcher ranges (types whose
begin/end/empty/etc require ADL lookup, types whose iteration
uses iterator + sentinel pair, etc) into their own file.
Now we delay allocating owning `NameAndLocation` instances until
we construct a new tracker (because a tracker's lifetime can be
significantly different from the underlying tracked-thing's name).
This saves 4239 allocations (436948 -> 432709) when running
`./tests/SelfTest -o /dev/null`, at some cost to code clarity
due to introducing a new ref type, `NameAndLocationRef`.
This is primarily done to support new `std::*_ordering` types,
but the refactoring also supports any other type with this
property.
The compilation overhead is surprisingly low. Testing it with
clang on a Linux machine, compiling our SelfTest project takes
only 2-3% longer with these changes than it takes otherwise.
Closes#2555
They also got slapped with the `[approvals]` tag in the process,
because we have too many approval tests and want less of them,
and these particular tests don't bring much value.
Related to #2090
There is an increasing number of places where Catch2 wants to parse
strings into numbers, but being stuck in C++14 world, we do not
have good stdlib facilities to do this (`strtoul` and `stoul`
are both bad).
This might become potentially useful in the future, when we want
to provide the ability to forward jump generators, to be able to
simply reproduce specific input to a test.
I am not yet sure how it would work, but the basic idea is that
it could be similar to the `-c` switch for selecting specific
`SECTION` in a test case.
This is kinda messy, because there is no good way to signal to
the compiler that some code uses direct comparison of floating
point numbers intentionally, so instead we have to use diagnostic
pragmas.
We also have to over-suppress the test files, because Clang (and
possibly GCC) still issue warnings from template instantiation
even if the instantion site is under warning suppression, so the
template definition has to be under warning suppression as well.
Closes#2406
Martin Hořeňovský