This requires a bunch of different changes across the reporter
subsystem.
* We need to handle multiple reporters and their differing
preferences in `ListeningReporter`, e.g. what to do when
we mix reporters that capture and don't capture stdout.
* We need to change how the reporter is given output and
how we parse reporter's output destination from CLI.
* Approval tests need to handle multireporter option
* Add buildAndTest.cmd for Windows users
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <alanjo@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Hořeňovský <martin.horenovsky@gmail.com>
A new flag, `--allow-running-no-tests` was added to override this
behaviour if exit code of 0 was desired.
This change also made `-w NoTests` obsolete, and so it has been
removed.
Previously registration was case preserving, but lookup used
lowercased reporter name, so a reporter whose name contained
upper case character could not be requested by the user.
This greatly simplifies running Catch2 tests in single binary
in parallel from external test runners. Instead of having to
shard the tests by tags/test names, an external test runner
can now just ask for test shard 2 (out of X), and execute that
in single process, without having to know what tests are actually
in the shard.
Note that sharding also applies to test listing, and happens after
tests were ordered according to the `--order` feature.
The problem with the old name was that it collided with the
range matcher `Contains`, and it was not really possible to
disambiguate them just with argument types.
Closes#2131
This is a simplification of the fix proposed in #2152, with the
critical function split out so that it can be tested directly,
without having to go through the ULP matcher.
Closes#2152
`FetchContent` doesn't include `contrib` directory as part of `CMAKE_MODULE_PATH`. This results into `include(Catch)` to fail. This patch just updates the documentation describing how to do include the path, so the new users don't have to figure this out themselves.
Source: https://github.com/catchorg/Catch2/issues/2103#issuecomment-730626324
