This ended up being a surprisingly large refactoring, motivated
by removing a `const_cast` from `Config`'s handling of reporter
streams, forced by previous commit.
This way it makes much more sense from logically-const point
of view, and also means that concrete implementations don't
have to always have a `mutable` keyword on the stream member.
When the added Bazel configuration flag is enabled,
a default JUnit reporter will be added if the XML
envrioment variable is defined.
Fix include paths for generated config header.
Enable Bazel config by default when building with
Bazel.
Co-authored-by: Martin Hořeňovský <martin.horenovsky@gmail.com>
It has become completely vestigial, as it only ever passed-through
the argument down to a different function, and being private
member function, it didn't even introduce a useful compilation
firewall.
This means that the CLI interface now uses the new key-value oriented
reporter spec, the common reporter base creates the colour implementation
based on the reporter-specific configuration, and it also stores the
custom configuration options for each reporter instance.
Closes#339 as it allows per-reporter forcing of ansi colour codes.
The new reporter spec generalizes key-value options that can be
passed to the reporter, looking like this
`reporterName[::key=value]*`. A key can be either Catch2-recognized,
which currently means either `out` or `colour`, or reporter-specific
which is anything prefixed with `X`, e.g. `Xfoo`.
Test case hashing includes tags and class name
As the hasher involves more code now, it was split out into its own file
and it got its own set of tests.
Closes#2304
This includes always compiling the ANSI and None colour
implementations, as they don't need to touch any platform
specific APIs, and removing their respective compile-time
configuration options.
Because the Win32 colour implementation requires Win32-specific
APIs, it is still hidden behind a compile-time toggle,
`CATCH_CONFIG_COLOUR_WIN32` (renamed from `..._COLOUR_WINDOWS`).
The commandline options for colours were also changed. The
option now uses different name, and allows to select between
different implementations, rather than changing whether
the compiled-in colour implementation is used through
"yes/no/default" options.
Forcing it to be engaged explicitly, either via `op<<`, or by
`ColourGuard::engage`, fixes an issue with multiple `ColourGuard`s
being constructed in a single expression. Because the construction
of the `ColourGuard` instances can happen in arbitrary order,
colours would be applied in arbitrary order too. However, a chain
of `op<<`s has strict call orders, fixing this issue.
